Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-06

The State Of Karnataka vs M/S Vedanata Limited (Formerly Known As ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 916
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Karnataka
Respondent
M/S Vedanata Limited (Formerly Known As ...
Author
Ashok Bhushan
Bench
Ashok Bhushan, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court's decision to release seized iron ore, finding that the High Court correctly interpreted the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, specifically Sections 2(7)(b)(iv), 62, and 80, along with Rules 143 and 162 of the Karnataka Forests Rules, 1969. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural safeguards in the disposal of seized property under Section 451/457 Cr.P.C. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's order allowing the writ petitions for the release of the iron ore.

The State Of Karnataka vs M/S Vedanata Limited (Formerly Known As ... · Niyam