Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-06

Vishnu Chandru Gaonkar vs N.M. Dessai

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 1203
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vishnu Chandru Gaonkar
Respondent
N.M. Dessai
Author
Ashok Bhushan
Bench
Ashok Bhushan, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court analyzed the applicability of Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Cr.P.C. in the context of a complaint alleging forgery against a legal counsel. The Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the District & Sessions Judge's order for inquiry under Section 195(1)(b)(ii), as the allegations were more appropriately categorized under Section 195(1)(b)(i). The judgment emphasized the necessity of proper legal interpretation of statutory provisions in criminal proceedings, ultimately allowing the appeal and reinstating the inquiry order.

Vishnu Chandru Gaonkar vs N.M. Dessai · Niyam