Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-03-28

Honble High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Honble High Court Of Judicature At ...
Respondent
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Author
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of seniority determination for promotee and direct recruit Higher Judicial Service officers in Uttar Pradesh, focusing on Rules 22 and 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The Court reiterated that seniority must be determined based on the availability of vacancies and the timing of appointments, referencing previous judgments including All India Judges Association v. Union of India and P.K. Dixit v. State of U.P. The Court held that the seniority list must reflect the correct application of these principles, ensuring compliance with established precedents.

Honble High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh · Niyam