Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-07-06

SHANTI BHUSHAN vs SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR

Citation / case number
SC 2018/12405
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHANTI BHUSHAN
Respondent
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the administrative authority of the Chief Justice of India as the Master of Roster under Article 32 of the Constitution. The Court reaffirmed that while the Chief Justice has the discretion to allocate cases, this power must be exercised fairly and transparently, without bias towards any particular judge. The petitioner's request for a collegium of five senior judges to interpret 'Chief Justice' was noted, emphasizing the need for adherence to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 in case allocation procedures.

SHANTI BHUSHAN vs SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR · Niyam