Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-07-11

N.N. GODFRED . vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.( FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2

Citation / case number
SC 2010/32293
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N.N. GODFRED .
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.( FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2
Author
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating on Civil Appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, held that Submarine Pay should be included in the computation of pension for sailors in the Submarine Arm of the Indian Navy. The Court emphasized that Submarine Pay is a component of basic pay due to the hazardous nature of the work, thus overturning the Armed Forces Tribunal's decision which excluded it. The Court directed that the pension be recalculated to include Submarine Pay, ensuring fair treatment of the appellants in line with their service conditions.

N.N. GODFRED . vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.( FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2 · Niyam