Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-07-09

Raj Sharma @ Raj Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 348
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raj Sharma @ Raj Kumar Sharma
Respondent
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Author
Kurian Joseph
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 406 and Section 420 IPC, the offences are compoundable with the court's permission. The Court directed the release of Rs. 1,50,000/- deposited by the Appellant to the de-facto complainant, as he expressed no intention to proceed with prosecution. The Appellant was permitted to move the trial court for compounding the offence, and all coercive actions against him were to be withdrawn, emphasizing the importance of amicable resolution between parties.

Raj Sharma @ Raj Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh · Niyam