Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-07-11

N.N. Godfred . vs Union Of India And Ors.( For Respondent ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 3272
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N.N. Godfred .
Respondent
Union Of India And Ors.( For Respondent ...
Author
Indu Malhotra
Bench
Indu Malhotra, S. Abdul Nazeer

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a Civil Appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, held that Submarine Pay should be included in the computation of pension for sailors in the Submarine Arm of the Indian Navy. The Court emphasized that Submarine Pay, granted due to the hazardous nature of the work, constitutes part of the basic pay rather than an allowance. Consequently, the Court overturned the Armed Forces Tribunal's decision that excluded Submarine Pay from pension calculations, thereby ensuring the appellants receive their rightful pension benefits.

N.N. Godfred . vs Union Of India And Ors.( For Respondent ... · Niyam