Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-01-08

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION vs PRADEEP KUMAR

Citation / case number
SC 2016/21388
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
Respondent
PRADEEP KUMAR
Author
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Screening Committee's decision to deny employment to candidates who disclosed their criminal involvement, despite acquittal under Section 323 IPC and Section 506 read with Section 34 IPC, was valid. The Court emphasized that acquittal does not automatically confer a right to appointment, and the appointing authority retains discretion to assess suitability for a disciplined force like the Chandigarh Police. The Court upheld the Screening Committee's findings, affirming the principle that past criminal involvement can impact employment suitability in law enforcement.

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION vs PRADEEP KUMAR · Niyam