Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-01-17

The State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Trilok Chand

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 609
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Himachal Pradesh
Respondent
Trilok Chand
Author
N.V. Ramana
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision that acquitted the accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, specifically Section 20, which pertains to the possession of narcotic drugs. The Court found that the High Court had erred in giving undue weight to minor discrepancies in the prosecution's evidence while ignoring substantial corroborative testimony from official witnesses. The Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's conviction and sentence of ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, emphasizing the importance of the evidence presented by law enforcement officers in drug-related cases.

The State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Trilok Chand · Niyam