Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-01-30

Shahid Jamal vs State Of U.P.

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 285
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shahid Jamal
Respondent
State Of U.P.
Author
Kurian Joseph
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the appellants' application for reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on the grounds of being time-barred. The Court found that the appellants had made a valid request for reference on 24.07.1999, which was within the six-month period stipulated under Section 18(2) of the Act. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and directed the reference to be made to the appropriate court.

Shahid Jamal vs State Of U.P. · Niyam