Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-02

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs AJAY MARATHE

Citation / case number
SC 2017/39253
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
AJAY MARATHE
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court directed that the writ petitions challenging the Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 2017, be referred to a Constitution Bench of five judges due to substantial constitutional questions raised regarding its validity under Articles 14, 21, 29, and 48 of the Constitution of India. The Court considered whether the Act perpetuates cruelty to animals, its relation to cultural heritage, and its compliance with previous judgments, particularly Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja (2014) 7 SCC 547. The reference was made to ensure an authoritative interpretation of the constitutional issues involved.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs AJAY MARATHE · Niyam