Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-16

TANIYA MALIK vs REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
SC 2017/25375
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TANIYA MALIK
Respondent
REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating on writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the validity of the Delhi Judicial Service Examination, 2015. The Court held that the criteria for calling candidates for viva voce, specifically the requirement of obtaining 40% marks in each subject, was not arbitrary and upheld the examination results. The Court also emphasized the need for transparency in evaluation and the importance of adhering to the prescribed qualifying marks as per the Delhi Judicial Services Rules, 1970.

TANIYA MALIK vs REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI · Niyam