Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-23

SUNIL SAMDARIA vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE THROUGH SECRETARY

Citation / case number
SC 2017/16048
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUNIL SAMDARIA
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE THROUGH SECRETARY
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appointment of Additional Judges of the Rajasthan High Court under Article 224 of the Constitution of India. The Court held that the appointments were valid as they complied with Article 217(2) and Article 224, noting that the judges had previously held judicial office for the requisite period and their appointments were made before reaching the age of superannuation. The Court clarified that the judgments cited by the petitioner did not support his claims regarding the invalidity of the appointments.

SUNIL SAMDARIA vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE THROUGH SECRETARY · Niyam