Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-23

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA vs M/S. PROGRESSIVEMVR(JV)

Citation / case number
SC 2016/41773
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Respondent
M/S. PROGRESSIVEMVR(JV)
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of sub-clause 70.3 of the Conditions of Particular Application (COPA) in contracts awarded by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) for road construction. The Court held that the price adjustment formula must consider the base rates of materials like bitumen, cement, and steel as prevailing 28 days prior to bid submission, clarifying that these rates are essential for calculating the actual percentage of costs. The judgment emphasized the need for clarity in contract terms to ensure fair execution and compliance with the agreed-upon pricing mechanisms.

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA vs M/S. PROGRESSIVEMVR(JV) · Niyam