Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-01

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE SERVICE TAX vs ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD

Citation / case number
SC 2016/35753
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE SERVICE TAX
Respondent
ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on Goods Transport Agency services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Court held that transportation services availed post-clearance of goods from the factory do not qualify as input services for Cenvat Credit purposes. The ruling affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's decision to demand recovery of Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 25,66,131/- and interest under relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Finance Act, 1994.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE SERVICE TAX vs ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD · Niyam