Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-06

CHHABILDAS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Citation / case number
SC 2015/2819
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHHABILDAS
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the implications of Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, particularly focusing on Sub-section (7), which mandates that if the Appropriate Authority does not apply to acquire land within one year of a confirmed purchase notice, the designation or reservation of that land lapses. The Court held that the failure to act within the stipulated time frame results in the automatic lapse of the reservation, thereby reinforcing the need for timely action by authorities in land acquisition matters. This judgment clarifies the procedural obligations of the Appropriate Authority under the Act.

CHHABILDAS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT · Niyam