Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-08

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs SHAILENDRA (DEAD) THROUGH ITS LRS. AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2015/13346
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Respondent
SHAILENDRA (DEAD) THROUGH ITS LRS. AND ORS.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, particularly regarding the terms 'paid' and 'tender'. The Court held that non-deposit of compensation in court under Section 31(2) of the Act of 1894 does not automatically result in a lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013. The judgment also referred to the implications of interim orders on the determination of possession and compensation claims, indicating a need for clarity on these legal principles.

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs SHAILENDRA (DEAD) THROUGH ITS LRS. AND ORS. · Niyam