Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-15

SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD. REPRESENTED BY MR. J. THILAK SENIOR MANAGER (LEGAL) vs ABDUL SAMAD

Citation / case number
SC 2014/20116
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD. REPRESENTED BY MR. J. THILAK SENIOR MANAGER (LEGAL)
Respondent
ABDUL SAMAD
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the conflicting opinions of various High Courts regarding the execution of arbitration awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that an award can be executed directly in the court where the assets are located without needing to first file it in the court with jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings, thereby clarifying the applicability of Section 36 of the Act. The Court emphasized the need for uniformity in the execution process of arbitration awards across jurisdictions.

SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD. REPRESENTED BY MR. J. THILAK SENIOR MANAGER (LEGAL) vs ABDUL SAMAD · Niyam