Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-16

JAYANT VERMA . vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2012/28779
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JAYANT VERMA .
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, which prohibits courts from scrutinizing the rates of interest charged by banking companies. The Court held that this provision does not violate any fundamental rights and is a valid legislative measure aimed at protecting banking transactions from judicial interference. The petitioners' request for the abolition of Section 21A was denied, affirming the legislature's intent to maintain stability in banking operations.

JAYANT VERMA . vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam