Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-12

MAXOPP INVESTMENT LTD.. vs COMMR.OF I.T NEW DELHI

Citation / case number
SC 2012/11457
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAXOPP INVESTMENT LTD..
Respondent
COMMR.OF I.T NEW DELHI
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which prohibits deductions for expenditures incurred in relation to income that does not form part of total income. The Court held that the purpose of Section 14A is to prevent double benefits for taxpayers, ensuring that if income is exempt from tax, related expenditures cannot be deducted. The judgment clarified that the dominant intention behind acquiring shares, whether for control or as stock-in-trade, must be considered when determining the applicability of Section 14A.

MAXOPP INVESTMENT LTD.. vs COMMR.OF I.T NEW DELHI · Niyam