Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-08

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA (D) TH.LRS. vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (CIVIL SUPPLIES)

Citation / case number
SC 2010/24495
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA (D) TH.LRS.
Respondent
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (CIVIL SUPPLIES)
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that a review under Section 16(5)(a) of The Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 is maintainable concerning an order regarding vacancy. The Court emphasized that a finding of vacancy is a prerequisite for any order of allotment or release under Section 16(1)(a) or (b), and thus, the review provision serves to ensure lawful orders are made. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the District Magistrate was justified in exercising review jurisdiction under the Act.

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA (D) TH.LRS. vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (CIVIL SUPPLIES) · Niyam