Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-02-15

Sundaram Finance Ltd. Represented By ... vs Abdul Samad

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 965
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sundaram Finance Ltd. Represented By ...
Respondent
Abdul Samad
Author
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Bench
J. Chelameswar, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the conflicting views of various High Courts regarding the execution of arbitration awards under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. It clarified that an award must first be filed in the court having jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings for execution, as per Section 36 of the Act, before obtaining a transfer of the decree to the court where the assets are located. The Court held that the execution proceedings initiated directly in the court where the assets are located were not maintainable, thereby upholding the trial court's order for lack of jurisdiction.

Sundaram Finance Ltd. Represented By ... vs Abdul Samad · Niyam