Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-12-04

Sp Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1025
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sp Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
State Of Himachal Pradesh
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
Indira Banerjee, R. Banumathi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be challenged if it is made in accordance with the terms of the agreement, as established in Antrix Corporation Limited v. Devas Multimedia Private Limited (2014) 11 SCC 560. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to dismiss the arbitration petition, ruling that the appellant's remedy lies under Section 13 and Section 34 of the Act, not Section 11(6). Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the validity of the arbitrator's appointment.

Sp Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh · Niyam