Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-12-14

Deepu @ Deepak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Citation / case number
AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 265
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Deepu @ Deepak
Respondent
The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Author
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's confirmation of charges against the appellant under Sections 394 and 460 IPC, and alternatively under Sections 302 and 397 IPC, along with Sections 25(1B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act. The Court ruled that the Trial Court correctly applied Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. to proceed against the appellant based on a supplementary charge-sheet that provided sufficient evidence, including witness identification and forensic reports. The Court found no reason to interfere with the orders, affirming the sufficiency of material against the appellant for framing charges.

Deepu @ Deepak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh · Niyam