K. ANBAZHAGAN AND ETC. vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF MADRAS

The Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court's dismissal of writ petitions filed by Fast Track Judges seeking absorption into the regular cadre and claiming retiral benefits, including pension and gratuity. The Court reiterated the principles established in Brij Mohan Lal Vs. Union of India, emphasizing the temporary nature of ad hoc appointments under the Eleventh Finance Commission. The Court held that the appellants, having served as Fast Track Judges, were not entitled to regularization or benefits post their tenure, affirming the High Court's decision.