Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-30

KAPIL KUMAR vs DELHI SUBORDINATE SER.SEL.BOARD

Citation / case number
SC 2011/33808
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KAPIL KUMAR
Respondent
DELHI SUBORDINATE SER.SEL.BOARD
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Articles 16(4), 341, and 342 of the Constitution regarding the entitlement of Scheduled Caste candidates to benefits in employment across different states. The Court noted that the decision in S. Pushpa was perceived as contrary to earlier Constitution Bench judgments and emphasized that a two-judge bench cannot declare a three-judge bench decision as per incuriam. The matter was referred to a larger bench for resolution of the interplay among the mentioned Articles, but the specific question was not answered in the appeal's disposition.

KAPIL KUMAR vs DELHI SUBORDINATE SER.SEL.BOARD · Niyam