Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-30

TANVI DINESH PATEL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Citation / case number
SC 2010/33701
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TANVI DINESH PATEL
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Articles 16(4), 341, and 342 of the Constitution regarding the entitlement of Scheduled Caste candidates to benefits in employment across different States. The Court held that the Presidential Orders under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) do not restrict a State's ability to provide reservations for Backward Classes. The matter was referred to a larger bench for further clarification on the interplay of these constitutional provisions, affirming the High Court's findings that the State's actions were legally flawed.

TANVI DINESH PATEL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT · Niyam