Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-07

KUSAL TOPPA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Citation / case number
SC 2009/21612
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KUSAL TOPPA
Respondent
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Accused No.1 and Accused No.4 under Section 302 IPC and Section 392 IPC, affirming the trial court's sentence of life imprisonment and seven years' rigorous imprisonment respectively. The Court clarified that the dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed by co-accused does not affect the validity of the trial court's judgment, as established in Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala and State of Punjab v. Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar. The Court emphasized that the prosecution had sufficiently established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

KUSAL TOPPA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND · Niyam