Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-20

SAVATRAM RAMPRATAP MILL vs RADHEYSHYAM S/O LAXMINARAYAN GOENKAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/9356
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SAVATRAM RAMPRATAP MILL
Respondent
RADHEYSHYAM S/O LAXMINARAYAN GOENKAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, must be initiated at the location of the public premises, as specified under Section 3 of the Act. The Court ruled that the notices issued by the Estate Officer directing attendance in Mumbai were invalid since the cause of action arose in Akola. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's order quashing the notices and allowing the writ petition.

SAVATRAM RAMPRATAP MILL vs RADHEYSHYAM S/O LAXMINARAYAN GOENKAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR. · Niyam