Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-10

Ved Pal (D) Tr.Lrs.. vs Prem Devi (D) Tr.Lrs..

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 641
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ved Pal (D) Tr.Lrs..
Respondent
Prem Devi (D) Tr.Lrs..
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the High Court's order dismissing the review petition and permitting the appellants to amend their review petition regarding the compromise in the second appeal. The Court emphasized the legislative intent behind Order 23 Rule 3-A and Section 96(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which restricts challenges to compromises unless based on fraud. The Court held that the High Court must re-examine the appellants' grievances concerning the compromise, as it significantly affects the parties' rights.

Ved Pal (D) Tr.Lrs.. vs Prem Devi (D) Tr.Lrs.. · Niyam