Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-29

Krishan Kumar Madan vs Ashok Kumar

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 5009
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Krishan Kumar Madan
Respondent
Ashok Kumar
Author
A.M. Khanwilkar
Bench
Indira Banerjee, D Y Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Uttarakhand High Court, affirming that the appellants, initially appointed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, remained employees of Uttar Pradesh and were not entitled to claim employment status in Uttarakhand. The Court noted that the appellants had exercised their option to serve in Uttarakhand but the transfer was contingent upon mutual consent, which was not adequately established. The Court emphasized the importance of proper procedural adherence in employee transfers under the Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2000.

Krishan Kumar Madan vs Ashok Kumar · Niyam