Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-21

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Achal Singh

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 3940
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent
Achal Singh
Author
Arun Mishra
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, Arun Mishra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of voluntary retirement under Rule 56 of the Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules, determining that while employees have the right to seek voluntary retirement, the State Government retains the authority to decline such requests in the public interest as per the Explanation to Rule 56. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to grant voluntary retirement to the respondents, emphasizing the need for the State to address the underlying issues causing doctors to opt for retirement. The judgment reinforces the balance between employee rights and administrative discretion in public service.

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Achal Singh · Niyam