Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-08-09

M/S Popat And Kotecha Property vs Ashim Kumar Dey

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 3751
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Popat And Kotecha Property
Respondent
Ashim Kumar Dey
Author
Ranjan Gogoi
Bench
Navin Sinha, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 5(8) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, a tenant is obligated to pay municipal taxes as an occupier, which constitutes a default in rent if unpaid. The Court found that the High Court's ruling, which upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the landlord's eviction petition due to lack of evidence of tax enhancement and the requirement for Rent Controller approval for rent increase, was correct. Consequently, the appeal by the landlord was dismissed, affirming the tenant's position.

M/S Popat And Kotecha Property vs Ashim Kumar Dey · Niyam