Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-24

RAM PAL SINGH vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2017/37024
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM PAL SINGH
Respondent
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified that an 'elected member' of a Kshettra Panchayat, as defined under Section 6(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961, remains an elected member regardless of whether they have taken the oath of office. The Court held that the only consequence of not taking the oath is the inability to take a seat in the Panchayat, as per Rule 3(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats (Oath of Office of Adhyaksha or Pramukh Etc.) Rules, 1994. Thus, the sanctity of the oath does not affect the status of being an elected member.

RAM PAL SINGH vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH · Niyam