Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-03

STATE BANK OF PATIALA vs KANWAL NAIN SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 2008/37505
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE BANK OF PATIALA
Respondent
KANWAL NAIN SINGH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court regarding the respondent's voluntary retirement under the Bank's Voluntary Retirement Scheme, emphasizing that Clause 9 of the Scheme, which states that applications cannot be withdrawn, is binding. The Court clarified that the respondent's retirement was valid despite his attempt to withdraw his application the following day. The Court also addressed the calculation of ex-gratia payments, affirming that they were based on the total length of service until the actual retirement date, thus rejecting the respondent's claims for enhanced payments.

STATE BANK OF PATIALA vs KANWAL NAIN SINGH · Niyam