Aparbal Yadav vs The State Of Up

The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench of the High Court erred in modifying the interim order of the learned Single Judge regarding the payment of salary to the appellant, who had been continuously employed for over thirty years. The Court emphasized that stopping the salary based on doubt was unjustified and reinstated the interim arrangement allowing the appellant to receive salary arrears within one month. The appeal was allowed, and the Division Bench's judgment was set aside, ensuring the writ petition would be decided on its merits without influence from prior judgments.