Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-27

Commissioner Of Income Tax Karnal vs M/S Carpet India.Panipat(Haryana)

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1327
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Income Tax Karnal
Respondent
M/S Carpet India.Panipat(Haryana)
Author
R.K.Agrawal
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, R.K. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the eligibility of a supporting manufacturer for export incentives. The Court held that a supporting manufacturer, like M/s. Carpet India (P) Ltd., is not entitled to claim deductions under Section 80HHC at par with direct exporters, as the circumstances differ significantly from those in Commissioner of Income Tax, Thiruvantanpuram vs. Baby Marine Exports (2007) 290 ITR 323 (SC). The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, overturning the lower court's decision that favored the assessee's claim for deductions.

Commissioner Of Income Tax Karnal vs M/S Carpet India.Panipat(Haryana) · Niyam