Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-19

Subhash Chandra Sen(D) Thr.Lrs And Ors vs Nabin Sain(D)Thr.Lrs.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2018 SC 1233
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Subhash Chandra Sen(D) Thr.Lrs And Ors
Respondent
Nabin Sain(D)Thr.Lrs.
Author
S. Abdul Nazeer
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, N.V. Ramana

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a partition dispute under the Partition Act, 1893, where the trial court initially granted a decree for partition of property, allocating 3/5th share to the plaintiff. The High Court later set aside an amendment allowing a sketch map to be part of the decree, which was necessary for execution. The Supreme Court held that the trial court's amendment was justified to facilitate execution, emphasizing the importance of clarity in partition decrees for effective enforcement.

Subhash Chandra Sen(D) Thr.Lrs And Ors vs Nabin Sain(D)Thr.Lrs. · Niyam