State Of Gujarat vs Utility Users Welfare Association ...

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of the term 'may' in the Electricity Act, 2003, specifically regarding the appointment of Chairpersons for State and Central Regulatory Commissions. The Court held that the term should not be interpreted as mandatory, thus allowing for non-judicial appointments, contrary to the Gujarat High Court's ruling. The decision clarified that while a judicial mind is beneficial, it is not a legal requirement under the Act, resolving the conflict between different High Court interpretations.