Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-24

Add. Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Bharat V. Patel

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 2681
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Add. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Respondent
Bharat V. Patel
Author
R.K.Agrawal
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, R.K. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the amount received by the Respondent on redemption of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) should be treated as capital gains under Section 45 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rather than as a perquisite under Section 17(2)(iii). The Court clarified that the nature of the payment is crucial in determining tax liability, reinforcing the principle that capital gains arise from the transfer of a capital asset. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's ruling.

Add. Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Bharat V. Patel · Niyam