Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-27

Prof. Chintamani Malviya vs High Court Of Madhya Pradesh

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 2656
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Prof. Chintamani Malviya
Respondent
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
Author
Uday Umesh Lalit
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Arun Mishra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the High Court's order authorizing the Principal Registrar to file a complaint under Section 195(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) for alleged perjury by the appellant regarding service of notice in an election petition. The Court held that the High Court's findings on the service of notice were justified, and the authorization to file a complaint was appropriate given the circumstances. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to proceed with the complaint against the appellant.

Prof. Chintamani Malviya vs High Court Of Madhya Pradesh · Niyam