Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-24

Income Tax Officer Ward No.16(2) vs M/S Techspan India Private ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 2113
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Income Tax Officer Ward No.16(2)
Respondent
M/S Techspan India Private ...
Author
R.K. Agrawal
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R.K. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the re-opening of completed assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requires the Assessing Officer to demonstrate that income has escaped assessment due to a failure to disclose material facts. The Court found that the High Court erred in quashing the notice and re-assessment order, as the Revenue had sufficient grounds to initiate proceedings under Section 147. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the High Court's decision was set aside, reinstating the re-assessment order.

Income Tax Officer Ward No.16(2) vs M/S Techspan India Private ... · Niyam