Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-09

Uma Pandey vs Munna Pandey

Citation / case number
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 1930
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Uma Pandey
Respondent
Munna Pandey
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, R.K. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the second appeal in limine, stating it involved substantial questions of law under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court emphasized that the appeal should have been admitted for final hearing, as the rights of the parties were determined based on evidence, including a crucial document relied upon by both lower courts. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the case for fresh consideration on merits.

Uma Pandey vs Munna Pandey · Niyam