Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-03

Shafhi Mohammad vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shafhi Mohammad
Respondent
The State Of Himachal Pradesh
Author
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of adopting modern technology, specifically videography, in the investigation process under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The Court referred to Section 52A of the Act regarding pretrial disposal of contraband and highlighted the importance of videography in documenting identification processes and confessional statements under Sections 54A and 164 of the Cr.P.C. The Court directed the Home Secretary to assess the implementation of these technological measures across investigating agencies to enhance crime investigation and prevention.

Shafhi Mohammad vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh · Niyam