Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2018

Supreme Court of India · 2018-04-19

M/S Essel Infra Projects Ltd. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Essel Infra Projects Ltd.
Respondent
The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Author
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court directed that proceedings under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 should ideally be resolved within one to two years to ensure timely dispute resolution. The Court emphasized the need for the State to monitor the timeliness of arbitration proceedings and suggested that the Chairman of the Tribunal communicate any shortage of Benches to the State Government. The Court also stated that revision petitions before the High Court should be disposed of expeditiously, ideally within two years, and recommended statutory amendments if timelines cannot be achieved.

M/S Essel Infra Projects Ltd. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh · Niyam