Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-13

MANOJ KUMAR ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2016/27497
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANOJ KUMAR ETC. ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC.
Author
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals regarding compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically Sections 4 and 18. The Court held that the High Court's reliance on the Swaran Singh case for determining compensation was flawed, as it did not adequately consider the specific circumstances and evidence presented, including various sale deeds. The Court ultimately set aside the High Court's compensation rate of Rs.3610 per square meter, indicating the need for a more nuanced approach to valuation.

MANOJ KUMAR ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. · Niyam