Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-05

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs KISHOR M. GADHAVE PATIL WORKING AS ADDL. GOVT. PLEADER/ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Citation / case number
SC 2016/2709
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
KISHOR M. GADHAVE PATIL WORKING AS ADDL. GOVT. PLEADER/ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Bombay High Court's order that quashed the cancellation of appointments of Additional Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors under Rule 30(5) of the Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointments, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984. The Court noted that the terms of the respondents had expired during the pendency of the appeal, rendering the issue moot as they could not be reinstated regardless of the High Court's ruling. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of without granting any relief to the respondents.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs KISHOR M. GADHAVE PATIL WORKING AS ADDL. GOVT. PLEADER/ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR · Niyam