Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-08

THE MANAGER PALATHINGAL A.M.L.P. SCHOOL, PARAPPANANGADI vs SETHUMADHAVAN P.K. .

Citation / case number
SC 2016/13960
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE MANAGER PALATHINGAL A.M.L.P. SCHOOL, PARAPPANANGADI
Respondent
SETHUMADHAVAN P.K. .
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the Writ Appeal No.669 of 2016, affirming the Single Judge's decision that the upgradation of the appellant school from junior primary to upper primary was invalid due to non-compliance with the Kerala Education Rules, 1959, specifically Rule 2 of Chapter V. The Court noted that the government had not followed the required procedure, including failing to notify nearby schools for objections. However, it allowed the existing students to continue their education until the next academic year, permitting the government to reconsider the upgradation after adhering to the proper procedures.

THE MANAGER PALATHINGAL A.M.L.P. SCHOOL, PARAPPANANGADI vs SETHUMADHAVAN P.K. . · Niyam