Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-15

RATANLAL vs PRAHLAD JAT

Citation / case number
SC 2012/22881
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RATANLAL
Respondent
PRAHLAD JAT
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to allow re-examination of witnesses under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, emphasizing the need to ensure justice by allowing the best possible evidence. The Court noted that the Sessions Judge had dismissed the applications for re-examination on the grounds of delay and previous witness statements, but the High Court found merit in the witnesses' claims of having been influenced during their initial testimonies. The Court affirmed the High Court's ruling, stating that the Sessions Judge has the discretion to re-examine witnesses to meet the ends of justice.

RATANLAL vs PRAHLAD JAT · Niyam