Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-20

ABDUL HAMID AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THE GENERAL MANAGER

Citation / case number
SC 2008/26447
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ABDUL HAMID AND ORS.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THE GENERAL MANAGER
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision that the Railway's memo restricting eligibility for 'fresh face substitutes' to only those who completed apprenticeship with the Railways violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The Court emphasized that all qualified candidates should have the opportunity to apply, regardless of their apprenticeship background. The memo dated 30th August, 2004 was quashed, affirming the principle of equal opportunity in employment.

ABDUL HAMID AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THE GENERAL MANAGER · Niyam